![]() ![]() Recently, this secret club was used to nominate and vet new moderators: – This thread has been locked by the moderators of r/conspiracy. If you have never heard of this secret club before, it is probably because any threads about it were removed: On this subreddit, moderators, former moderators and their “allies” discuss how /r/conspiracy should be moderated. r/conspiracy_conclave is a private subreddit that was supposedly set up for “the betterment of /r/conspiracy”. Eventually, another moderator had to step in and remove the post. This is despite the fact that the submission clearly broke Rule 1, which states: “Bigoted slurs are not tolerated.” When a user replied to the post with “Go f yourself, Nazi” – Sabremesh removed the reply and immediately banned them. In August of 2018, Sabremesh approved a post containing blatant antisemitic remarks. It is worth noting that this moderator recently used Rule 10 to ban somebody for calling a Holocaust denier a racist. He also recommended that members of the conclave should compile a list of the users that should be considered as personae non gratae:Ī leaked screenshot of the entire thread can be found here and here. Coincidentally, this user made the following post in a private subreddit called conspiracy_conclave:ĭespite stating otherwise, Sabremesh basically argued that users with anti-Trump sentiments should be labelled as “persona non grata” – A Latin term that translates into “an unacceptable or unwelcome person.” Sabremesh is the moderator that decided to invoke Rule 10 and remove the post in question. It is worth noting that in the past, Sabremesh has had no problem approving posts that could be interpreted as breaking Rule 10. In response, they muted the person who brought it up and refused to take any action. #What happened to lui calibre reddit modThis double-standard was also pointed out to the /r/conspiracy moderation team directly via mod mail. This blatant double-standard was highlighted by a number of users, who asked why yellowsnow2’s attack on the subreddit was allowed to stand if a similar post expressing the opposite viewpoint had been removed a day earlier: The post above was removed by moderator Sabremesh and the user who created the post was banned from the subreddit. However, what if you were to make a similar post, but from a more left-wing / anti-Sinclair perspective? His argument fell in line with the political views of the /r/conspiracy moderators as it attempted to lessen the impact of claims that a large telecommunications company with a known conservative slant was forcing local stations to repeat opinion pieces. However, because it pushed the narrative that CNN’s optionalsyndicate content was just as bad as Sinclair Broadcast Group’s mandatorycontent, it was allowed to stand. The post above could have been easily interpreted as a violation of Rule 10. Take a look at the following post by Reddit user yellowsnow2, in which he decried how bad /r/conspiracy had become: The rule sounds OK in theory, but is it fairly enforced? First violations will usually result in a warning but bans are at the mods’ discretion. Accusing another user of being a troll or shill can be viewed as an attack, depending on context. #What happened to lui calibre reddit modsPosts that attack this sub, users or mods thereof, will be removed. Rule 10 is one of those flaky rules that is purposely left open to interpretation. Not long after, the moderators removed afooltobesure’s post for violating Rule 10. On March 24th, 2018, a Reddit user called afooltobesure posted the following question on Reddit’s /r/conspiracy subreddit:Įssentially, afooltobesure was questioning why a /r/conspiracy moderator called Flytape had officially welcomed in “refugees” from the Trump community after their subreddit had been temporarily set to private. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |